Directorship & Shareholding
Who pulls the strings?​​​​
​​
​
Jump to:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
​​
-
Companies Act
-
King IV Report
-
MOI & Shareholders Agreement
​
RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES​​​
-
of Directors
-
of Shareholders
-
Is a Director an employee?
-
Is a Shareholder an employee?
-
How are directors appointed and removed?
-
How are Shareholders appointed and removed?
-
Risks of being:
-
a Director
-
a Shareholder
-
​
-
Appointing and removing Directors
-
Adding and removing Shareholders
-
Calling AGMs and other meetings
-
Company Year End
-
Declaring dividends
-
Other Company Secretarial
-
Questions you should ask at the next company AGM
​
-
Set up shareholding right - what documents you need
-
Buy/Sell - documents needed to sell shares
-
Shareholders Agreement - Why this document is one of the most important
​
​
​SHAREHOLDER AND DIRECTOR DISPUTES
Relating to:
-
Directorship
-
Breach of fiduciary duty
-
Company hijackings
-
S v F 2023 and technicalities of appointing Directors
-
Conflict of interest
-
Director performance
-
Firing/removing Directors
-
Hostile Takeovers
-
Non-competitive M&A
-
​
-
Shareholding
-
Dilution of Shares
-
Oppressive conduct
-
Removing Shareholders​
-
Shares were never issued
-
​
-
Finances
-
Dissipating company assets
-
Diluting company value
-
Forcing directors to sign surety
-
Not declaring dividends
-
Running the company as an extension of oneself
-
​
-
Governance
-
Improper meeting procedure​
-
Unauthorised changes
-
​​​​​
​​
SHAREHOLDING QUESTIONS
(coming soon)
-
I don't have a share certificate. Do I own shares or not?
-
Is Profit Sharing the same as Shareholding?
-
How do I buy shares?
-
How can I finance a purchase of shares
-
How do I transfer shares to someone else?
-
How and when do Shareholders get paid?
-
How are shares allocated?
-
What are the different types of shares, and which ones should I prefer?
-
Should I give away shares in my company in exchange for financial investment or sweat equity?
-
What are the tax implications of owning shares?
-
Do Shareholders still get paid if the company goes into Business Rescue / Liquidation?
-
Can a company resolve to make a director sign surety?​
-
The majority Shareholders are running the company down / failing to discharge their duties - what can I do?
-
I'm a minority shareholder and the majority is abusing its rights / oppressive conduct - what are my options?
-
Can you avoid paying your Shareholders?
-
Can you get rid of a Shareholder?
-
Can you seize shares back?
-
Can you dilute a Shareholder's power by issuing more shares?
-
Can a company buy its own shares back?
-
How are a company and its shares valued?
-
Do you have the shareholding you were promised?
-
How does divorce affect shareholding?​
-
How does insolvency affect shareholding?
SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
​
More information about Shareholder and Director disputes here.
Legal Framework
Directorship and governance of a company, as well as shareholding in it, are governed by the Companies Act 71 of 2008 as official legislation, as well as the King IV Report on Corporate Governance in South Africa.
​
Additionally, the founding document governing some administrative aspects of a company is found in its Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI).
​
Finally, relationships between Directors, Shareholders and the company are governed by specific contracts, like employment agreements and the Shareholders Agreement.
Rights and Responsibilities
Responsibilities of Directors
​Directors run the company on a day-to-day basis. They are empowered by virtue of appointment by the Shareholders to make decisions.
Directors have the right to:
-
Management - running the day-to-day operations of the company.
-
Participation - to attend and participate in board meetings.
-
Information - access to company records.
-
Payment - compensation for their services.
-
Indemnification - meaning that a director's actions on behalf of a company are assumed to be those of the company, and the director is not personally liable for failures - unless it can be proved that the director was not acting in good faith, breached fiduciary duties or treated the company as an extension of themselves (i.e. not a separate legal entity) - see our article on "The Corporate Veil and Liability of Company Directors" here.
​
​
Directors' responsibilities are to:
-
make important decisions for the good of the company, at board level - such as hiring of staff and service providers, financial decisions, and dealing with complaints;
-
exercise their functions in the best interests of the company and with the requisite degree of care, skill and diligence (Section 76(3) of the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008),
-
exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence expected of someone at a directorship level,
-
oversee and monitor, on an ongoing basis, how the consequences of an organisation’s activities and outputs affect its status as a responsible corporate citizen (King IV Report 3(14),
-
declare interests in proposed or existing transactions or arrangements with the company.
​​
Rights of Shareholders
-
Shareholders are the real owners of the company. Shareholders appoint Directors as day-to-day managers of the company, but all the really important decisions are made by the Shareholders (depending on the size of the company).
-
Right to share in the company's assets: Most importantly, Shareholders are entitled to dividends in the company (provided it is making profit and declaring dividends) as reward for their investment and effort.
-
Right to vote: Shareholders have the right to call meetings, attend, vote at and speak at meetings, either by themselves or proxy, and to table and pass resolutions concerning many aspects of the company (provided they can amass a majority vote).
-
Pre-emptive Rights: Shareholders usually have the right to be offered and purchase shares by other Shareholders wishing to sell their shares.
-
Right to Inspect Company Records: Shareholders have the right to inspect certain company records, including the register of shareholders, minutes of meetings, and other documents related to the governance of the company.
​
Responsibilities of Shareholders
-
As owners of the company, Shareholders enjoy more in the way of rights than responsibilities. Shareholders do not usually owe a fiduciary responsibility of care and trust to a company - that burden rests upon directors - although, there is developing case law which seems to recognise some fiduciary responsibility by Shareholders.
-
Shareholders are not inherently prohibited from holding shares in competing companies. For example, a Shareholder may hold shares in two competing biotech companies. Such a situation could theoretically be averted by an appropriate provision in the Shareholder's Agreement.
-
Shareholders can however be said to have some responsibilities:
-
Duty to minority Shareholders: Majority Shareholders are required by the Companies Act, and usually the Shareholders Agreement, to act in good faith and avoid actions that unfairly prejudice the rights and interests of the minority shareholders.
-
Duty to exercise financial and corporate oversight: Shareholders are typically responsible for capital contribution, determining strategy and control of the company by way of vote, reviewing financial statements and bearing the risk associated with their investment in the company if it performs poorly.
-
Contractual Obligations: In some cases, shareholder agreements may impose specific duties on shareholders, including fiduciary-like obligations. These are contractual in nature and not automatically imposed by law.
-
​
Is a Director an employee of the company?
-
Not necessarily. It depends on whether the Director is an Executive Director or a Non-Executive Director. Paragraph (g) of the definition of an employee in Fourth Schedule to the Income Tax Act defines a director of a private company as an employee. CIPC however gives you the option when appointing a director to define the director as an employee, or not. Please contact us for advice on your specific situation.​
​​
Is a Shareholder an employee of the company?
-
Not by virtue of being a Shareholder, no. It often happens (especially with startups and small companies) that the incorporator of the company is both sole Director and 100% Shareholder.​
-
But, as you can imagine, you can buy shares in a company and become a Shareholder, but that does not make you an employee.
​
How are directors appointed? - Appointment and Removal of Directors
-
Appointment of a director flows from mandate derived from a resolution passed by a majority of shareholders at a properly-constituted meeting.
-
For smaller companies, this is not usually done, because essentially the founder of the company is sole director and 100% shareholder.
-
Similarly, removal of directors is conducted at the pleasure of shareholders - by way of a valid majority resolution.
-
See the interesting matter of S v F 2023 which our firm continues to litigate, whereby an opposing faction claimed to have been appointed as directors by a different mechanism.​​
​
S v F 2023 and the technicalities of appointing Directors
-
In a recently published case in which we represented directors appointed by way of AGM, an opposing faction claimed directorship by way of appointment by previous outgoing directors.
-
The case raises questions about the authority of directors vs shareholders - who has the power to appoint directors? See Who's pulling the strings? below.
-
The case is currently set for argument in the Supreme Court of Appeal in August 2024.
​​
How are Shareholders appointed and removed?
-
It must be understood, and we specifically included this section, to make a point - a company does not appoint Shareholders, because Shareholders do not answer to a company - the company must answer its Shareholders. They are its investors and owners, and the company is their machine that exists to make them money.
-
Shareholders are added to a company usually by purchasing shares in return for cash, or otherwise in return for "sweat equity" - effectively a promise to work hard at growing the company using their skills.
​
-
Shareholders are not "removed" from ownership. We are often approached by clients (usually the majority shareholders in a company) who have a dispute with other Shareholders and wish to remove those Shareholders from the company. Note that a share is an asset, albeit an intangible one*, which is owned by the Shareholder. A Shareholder cannot just be "removed" from ownership.
* Intangible assets include shares and other securities, patents, software and trademarks.
​
What are the risks of being a Director?
Directors must act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders, adhering to their fiduciary duties of care, good faith and skill. Breach of fiduciary duty can result in personal liability or even criminal liability.
​
What are the risks of being a Shareholder?
Mainly, financial risk - i.e the loss of one's investment should the company fail.
As a general rule, shareholders do not owe a fiduciary duty to the company when exercising their rights and powers, but in certain circumstances they also be held liable for the debts of the company, most importantly its tax debts to SARS - or personal liability to creditors, if the interests of creditors have been disregarded.
Does my company have to have Directors or Shareholders?
​Yes. Although some new company owners don't realise it, every company has Shareholders - the person who incorporates the company is usually the 100% Shareholder.
​​
Technically, share certificates and a securities register should still be created - read more about the paperwork here.​​​​​​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
KINGMAKERS AND KING-BREAKERS.
​
We specialise in Shareholder and Director disputes, company hijackings, oppressive Shareholder conduct and Section 165 Applications.​
Governance
Governance of a company includes:
-
the rules of management
-
the procedures of calling meetings and passing resolutions
-
financial and operational management
-
compliance with fiduciary duties
-
corporate strategy and planning
-
risk management
-
regulatory compliance
-
stakeholder relations
Rules around company governance are contained in the Companies Act, the King IV Report, and the company MOI.
​
​
Appointing and removing Directors
Directors serve at the behest of the Shareholders, and are appointed and removed at the Shareholders' will.
Section 68(1) of the Companies Act provides that directors are elected "by the persons entitled to exercise voting rights in such an election".
In other words, Directors are appointed and removed by a resolution of a majority of Shareholders at a properly-constituted meeting.
For interest, see S v F 2023 and technicalities of appointing Directors - a case we have litigated since 2020, where a faction of would-be directors staked a claim to directorship by way of the outgoing director appointing them - instead of by majority Shareholder resolution.
​​
Adding Shareholders
Shareholders are added by way of purchase of shares either from the company or from other Shareholders. To ensure the process is conducted properly, the following is needed:
-
Investigate: The incoming Shareholder will conduct their due diligence into the company's finances and other matters.
-
The MOI: The incoming Shareholder must familiarise themselves with the company's MOI - this is the Rule Book for the running of the company.
-
Sign the Rule Book: The incoming Shareholder must sign the existing Shareholders Agreement. This contract is essentially the Rule Book governing interactions and powers of Shareholders.
-
Purchase Agreement: The incoming Shareholder must sign the Share Purchase Agreement, which is distinct from the Shareholders Agreement.
​
Removing Shareholders
-
This step is where conflict often arises. Business owners must understand that a share is an intangible asset, OWNED by the Shareholder. Majority Shareholders cannot just seize shares back from a minority Shareholder they no longer like.
-
To remove a Shareholder, the first prize would be to buy their shares from them - assuming they are willing to sell.
-
It is possible in certain narrow circumstances to force a Shareholder to return shares to the company via a court order.
​
​
Calling AGMs and other meetings
A company's Annual General Meeting (AGM) is its yearly meeting of Shareholders, where important tasks are conducted, most importantly:
-
reviewing its financial performance; and
-
making important strategic decisions.
These tasks can also be undertaken at other meetings of Shareholders during the year.
If a Shareholder is not given proper notice of a meeting, they may miss it and are effectively deprived of both information and the right to vote on decisions.
For this reason it is critical to comply with the technical requirements of calling meetings (i.e. proper notice with sufficient time) and ensure that all Shareholders are given ample notice. Failing to do so could invalidate a meeting and also invalidate the resolutions passed at that meeting.
Company Year End
A company's Financial Year End signals the point up to which its Annual Financial Statement (AFS) must be prepared. Section 30 of the Companies Act requires that a company prepare its AFS within six months after the end of its Financial Year End, so as to have the AFS ready for the next AGM.
​
Declaring dividends
A dividend is a portion of the company profits, paid to a Shareholder according to their shareholding percentage.
Dividends can take the form of cash, shares or other form of consideration.
Implicit herein is that the company has to make a profit in order to pay dividends. A Shareholder is therefore not guaranteed to receive dividends.
Unfortunately, many owners of profitable companies find ways to not declare dividends so as to avoid making payment to a Shareholder with whom they have a dispute. This is a form of oppressive conduct on Shareholders, inevitably resulting in fierce and complex litigation.
​
Questions you should ask at the next company AGM
Shareholders should take each company AGM seriously, treating it as an opportunity to review the performance of the company and its director(s).​ Shareholders should demand information on the following:
-
Financial performance, with particular attention to overspending or incorrect budgeting
-
Director performance, measured against director duties and KPIs
-
Strategy implementation in the previous Financial Year and next
-
What the company could have done better, and what it plans to do in the new year
-
What errors were discovered by the company accountants / auditors and what decisions were made about them.
​
​​
THE PAPERWORK
The Paperwork needed for Shareholding
DISPUTES BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS AND DIRECTORS
Common Shareholder / Director Disputes
The most common disputes we see in corporate governance are between directors and/or shareholders relating to the following.
​​
Disputes relating to directorship
-
Breach of fiduciary duty - for example, a director has been spending recklessly or using company money to pay for personal expenses. The other directors will naturally want to remove this director as soon as possible - but it is important to ensure that the process is conducted correctly in order to:
-
avoid CCMA claims, and​
-
prevent the director from making the argument that a meeting or disciplinary process was not conducted in compliance with labour law and the Companies Act.
-
​
-
Company hijackings - a scenario where opposing factions of directors emerge and a dispute arises as to who are the real directors of the company. A hijacking may involve fraud, where persons submit fraudulent director appointments to CIPC.
​
-
Conflict of interest - a conflict of interest may arise where a director has interests conflicting with his/her duties to the company, for example, moonlighting as the director of another company whose products or services conflict with that of the first company. It is important to foresee and prevent this by requiring all appointed directors to have signed a Restraint of Trade and Non-Solicitation Agreement.
​
-
Director performance - the shareholders may feel that a director's performance does not meet an acceptable standards, and may take action to discipline or even remove the director. However, this requires creating Benchmark Performance Standards in the first place - otherwise known as KPIs.
​​
-
Firing/removing Directors - as above, removing a director often results in a legal challenge by the director, either on technical grounds (for example, that a technical step was omitted or not conducted properly) or on substantive grounds - disputing whether their performance is indeed subpar or not.
​
-
Hostile Takeovers - in a similar vein to company hijackings, hostile takeovers can be orchestrated for example by an acquisition of the company, whether through incorrect BEE structuring or other share purchase strategies.
​
-
Non-competitive Mergers/Acquisitions - certain transactions such as mergers or acquisitions may constitute fundamental transactions in terms of the Companies Act. These transactions may need to be overseen by the Takeover Regulation Panel and may involve the Competition Commission. If you are planning to sell all of, or the majority of your company or assets, be sure to determine whether these requirements apply to the transaction.
​​
Disputes relating to shareholding
-
Share Dilution - majority shareholders may authorise and issue more shares, either retaining these for themselves or selling them to other parties. The result is that the shares owned by existing shareholders are diluted. The Shareholders Agreement should contain provisions prohibiting this.
​
-
Oppressive conduct, or abuse of shareholders, is usually conduct by majority shareholders abusing minority shareholders. For example, in a recent case we assisted a minority shareholder who was locked out of the company and had his laptop seized, thereby preventing from exercising his duties. The majority shareholders were attempting to force him to sell his shares back to them at ridiculous low price.
​
-
Removing Shareholders​ - we often see disputes, especially in young companies, where the founder regrets issuing shares to a partner and, not understanding the nature of shares, attempts to reclaim them. This can result in fierce, expensive litigation and it is better to pursue other options.
​
-
Shares were never issued - in one of the saddest cases we've seen, a client had worked for years helping a business partner start a company. The founder always promised her shares, but never gave anything in writing. It turned out that shares were never issued. If you are promised shares, ensure that you receive a share certificate, a copy of the company's securities register, and sign a fair Shareholders Agreement.
​
Disputes relating to Finances
-
Dissipating company assets / diluting company value - a common way of trying to force a minority shareholder to sell shares at an unfair price, majority shareholders attempt to move assets to another company, effectively reducing it to a shell.
​​​
-
Forcing directors to sign surety - in a recent case, the majority shareholders passed a resolution requiring minority shareholders to sign surety for the company's debts. The general principle is that one person (whether an individual or juristic) cannot bind another person to a contract without that person's consent. The majority shareholders attempted to force the minority shareholders to accept personal liability for the debt as part of an ongoing strategy of oppressive conduct.
​
-
Not declaring dividends - a company only pays dividends when it has made a profit, and upon a resolution to do so by shareholders - but dividends are not always guaranteed. However, where a company has made profit and shareholders do not declare dividends, it may constitute oppressive conduct and begs the question why dividends were not declared.
​​
-
Running the company as an extension of oneself - the most common example of this is where a director (usually of a smaller company) uses company finances to pay for his/her personal expenses. This siphons money away from the company, potentially putting the company at risk. A company enjoys legal identity separate from the individuals who run it, but where these individuals blur the lines, they expose the company to potential harm.
​
Disputes relating to Governance
-
Improper meeting procedure​ - the most common example of governance disputes is where shareholders seek to undermine resolutions based on technicalities such as the failure to deliver proper notice of a meeting, or conducting a meeting without a quorum (sufficient representation of shareholders present).
​​
-
Unauthorised changes - for example, to a company's Memorandum of Incorporation, which requires a special resolution of shareholders (usually more than 75%).
For expert guidance in corporate governance, shareholding and directorship, contact our Commercial Law Department.
To set up shareholding correctly, the following documents are needed:
​
-
Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI) - the founding document of the company. It prescribes, among other things, the rules for calling meetings and passing resolutions.
-
Shareholders Agreement - an essential contract between Shareholders, prescribing the powers, and responsibilities of Shareholders. Every Shareholder must sign the Agreement.
-
Share Purchase Agreement - separate from the Shareholders Agreement, this contract contains the mechanism for purchase and sale of shares.
-
Share Certificates - for share allocation to be complete, the company must issue official share certificates to Shareholders.
-
Securities Register - A list tracking all the authorised shares, issued shares, purchases of shares and transfer of shares, and Shareholder details.
-
Company Resolutions - relating to issuance, sale or transfer of shares.
​
​
Why is the Shareholders Agreement so important?
The Shareholders Agreement is a crucial document every company needs if it has more than one Shareholder:
-
Decision process - It specifies how decisions are made, including voting rights and procedures for approving major decisions.
-
Dispute resolution - It provides mechanisms for resolving disputes between Shareholders.
-
Transfer procedure - It specifies the mechanism for transfer of shares, such as right of first refusal, drag-along rights, and tag-along rights.
-
Minority rights - It contains fair and balanced protections for both majority shareholders and minority shareholders.
​​
One of the most common legal disputes arising from shareholding is a dispute between majority and minority shareholders, relating to a buyout, breakdown of relations, share dilution or other oppressive conduct by majority shareholders.​​